Skip to main content
Wintertrace

Comparison · LMN vs Wintertrace

LMN and Wintertrace, side by side

A neutral, sourced comparison between LMN by Granum's landscaping and snow & ice business-management platform and Wintertrace, an open-source, self-hosted alternative for winter-service documentation.

Who is LMN?

LMN by Granum — Granum is the parent brand (launched October 2025) uniting LMN, SingleOps, and Greenius; announcement datelined Atlanta, GA and Toronto, ON. On the market: LMN has served landscapers since 2009. It targets 3,000+ North American landscaping companies, spanning company-size tiers from 1-3 crews (Starter) to multi-location enterprise operations.

Official website →

Side by side

How LMN and Wintertrace compare
AspectLMNWintertrace
Provider & originLMN by Granum — Granum is the parent brand (launched October 2025) uniting LMN, SingleOps, and Greenius; announcement datelined Atlanta, GA and Toronto, ONsourceWintertrace — maintainer-led open-source project
On the market sinceLMN has served landscapers since 2009sourceReleased; developed in the open on GitHub
Hosting modelCloud-based web platform plus a mobile crew app (English and Spanish) with offline mode for field usesourceSelf-hosted on your own server
Pricing modelSubscription, billed monthly: Starter from $297/mo (1 office/crew-lead licence + 5 crew-member licences); Professional from $648/mo (3 office/crew-lead licences + 15 crew-member licences); Enterprise — contact sales; one-time onboarding fee appliessourceFree software; you pay only for hosting
ContractBilled monthly; one-time onboarding fee noted on the pricing page; no minimum contract term is publishedsourceNone — uninstalling removes it
Source codeProprietary (commercial SaaS)sourceOpen source (AGPLv3) on GitHub
ExtensibilityZapier integrations from the Professional tier up; client import via QuickBooks or CSV; payments via LMN Pay (Stripe); no public/open module systemsourceExtensible through installable modules
Data locationNot publicly documentedOn your own server — addresses, GPS tracks, photos
Feature scopeFull landscaping + snow & ice operations platform: budgeting, estimating, scheduling, time tracking, CRM, invoicing, job costing, plus snow-specific plow-pass tracking, salt-application tracking, GPS-based proof of service, route/priority-zone planning, and automatic post-event invoicingsourceFocused on winter-service documentation
Target customer3,000+ North American landscaping companies, spanning company-size tiers from 1-3 crews (Starter) to multi-location enterprise operationssourceOperators who want to own their data and tooling

Where LMN is stronger

LMN has been serving landscapers since 2009 and, per its own site, counts more than 3,000 North American landscaping companies as customers — a long operating history and an established user base that a newer project cannot match. It is a broad, all-in-one operations platform: budgeting, estimating, scheduling, CRM, invoicing, and job costing sit alongside snow-specific tools for tracking plow passes, salt applications, and proof of service, all under one vendor and spanning both the landscaping and snow/ice seasons. Wintertrace does not attempt any of that breadth — it stays focused on winter-service documentation.

LMN also offers a dedicated estimating product area, native payment processing through LMN Pay (powered by Stripe), QuickBooks/CSV import for client data, and Zapier integrations from its Professional tier up. Its training ecosystem is substantial: an “LMN Online Academy” video library plus dedicated onboarding/launch programs for each plan tier, backed by a company (now Granum) that also runs SingleOps for tree care and Greenius for crew training. Contractors who want one vendor covering estimating, scheduling, billing, and snow operations together — with a mature product and a large peer community — are well served by LMN.

Where Wintertrace makes a different offer

Wintertrace is open source (AGPLv3) and self-hosted: you run it on your own server rather than a vendor’s cloud, and there is no subscription for the software itself — only the cost of hosting it. That also means the underlying job, customer, GPS, and photo data stays on infrastructure you control, rather than a vendor’s platform, for as long as you want to keep it.

The other structural difference is extensibility. Wintertrace ships a focused core for winter-service documentation, then grows through installable modules — rather than a fixed, vendor-defined feature set or a tiered per-seat subscription. Operators who need a specific capability can add the corresponding module instead of waiting on a vendor roadmap or upgrading to a higher-priced tier for a bundle of features they don’t need. The resulting records may support liability cases; they are not a substitute for legal advice.

Who should pick what

If you run a landscaping business that also does snow and ice work, and you want a single subscription covering estimating, scheduling, CRM, billing, and crew training alongside snow tracking — with a large, mature vendor and an established peer network behind it — LMN’s breadth is the more direct fit.

If you mainly run winter-service work and want to own your data and your tooling, without paying per-seat for a landscaping-wide operations suite, Wintertrace is built for that. The two are not mutually exclusive: some operators run LMN for landscaping-side estimating and billing while keeping a self-hosted documentation trail for winter-service jobs alongside it.

Public information as of 11 July 2026. Based on publicly available information. We have not tested the software ourselves.

Operator of LMN: is something outdated or wrong? Tell us and we will correct it.

Wintertrace provides documentation support. It is not a substitute for legal advice.

Wintertrace is early and shaped by real winter service work. Share your feedback →